<Research Question>
What is my current topic?
*"Controling and calming down one's mind during physical activity can cause advanced result?" is my current topic. It is about controling one's mind's can effect on result. So i want to find some actual results in sport games and some thesis about controling's effect. Also My essay will be about that and i will use real examples like mine, friend's, sport players.
What are my guiding questions?
* " Concentraion can influence our physical ability?",
" Concentraion in sports is effective?"
" When player don't concentrate, then worse effect return?"
" What is definition of concentration?"
" Concentration just influence on physical stablity?
" Calming down and concentraion are different or same?"
What are my current thoughts?
* In my case, when i concentrate in exercising or doing sports, I think i can do well and have a good score. So i already think that controling and calming down one's mind during physical activity can cause advanced result. And i already know that concentration can improve results, calming down
control human's mind.
What is the opposition?
*What will your opponents say? What is the common belief that you are arguing against? What counterarguments do you anticipate?*
I think my opponents will say concentraion or calming down and improved result's relation is just coincidence.
<Classical argument Outline>
1. The introduction, which warms up the audience, establishes goodwill and rapport with the readers, and announces the general theme or thesis of the argument.
I will start by describing the situation everyone is already familiar with: "Controling and calming down one's mind during physical activity can cause advanced result." Then I will shift attention to definition of concentraion and effect of concentraion or calming down one's mind. Also I will explain my and people's real experiences. Finally I will end with my thesis, "If people concentrate or calm one's mind to stable condition, they can get better score in sports game or reinforce their physical level."2. The narration, which summarizes relevant background material, provides any information the audience needs to know about the environment and circumstances that produce the argument, and set up the stakes-what’s at risk in this question. In academic writing, this often takes the form of a literature review.
I will summarize the research I've done and provide an explanation for how concentraion or calming down's effect in sports and physical ability. I will give a real instances when people can fill their reinforced pyhsical ability and have a better record in sport game.3. The confirmation,which lays out in a logical order (usually strongest to weakest or most obvious to most subtle) the claims that support the thesis, providing evidence for each claim.
I will start by examining how concentration influence to human and what kind of results are influenced by concentration. I will examine people's condition and result's relationship according to researches, real instances. I will describe reinforced physical ability based on people's psychology. I will examine the statistical evidence that different results between people who calm down and who don't control condition.4. The refutation and concession, which looks at opposing viewpoints to the writer’s claims, anticipating objections from the audience, and allowing as much of the opposing viewpoints as possible without weakening the thesis.
I think opponents will say better result and concentration or calming down are not related, they are just coincidence. I think opponents will say concentration is just one way of mental controling and it is seemed that itinfluence one's ability and results.5. The summation, which provides a strong conclusion, amplifying the force of the argument, and showing the readers that this solution is the best at meeting the circumstances.
I will close with a summary of my previous points, then i will explain concentration and calming down one's mind's effect again to emphasize that more . I will end with a reaffirmation of my original thesis.
